If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech RepublicFaculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech RepublicFaculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech RepublicFaculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech RepublicFaculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Cancer cells survive via overexpressed anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins.
•
Venetoclax is highly selective BCL2 inhibitor with an acceptable toxicity profile.
•
Venetoclax overcomes resistance to ibrutinib and idelalisib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
•
Venetoclax is effective in a subset of multiple myeloma patients with translocation t(11;14).
•
Venetoclax has synergic activity with low-dose cytarabine, 5-azacytidine (5-Aza) in acute myeloid leukemia.
Inhibitors of antiapoptotic proteins of the BCL2 family can successfully restart the deregulated process of apoptosis in malignant cells. Whereas nonselective agents have been limited by their affinity to different BCL2 members, thus inducing excessive toxicity, the highly selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (ABT-199, Venclexta™) has an acceptable safety profile. To date, it has been approved in monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with 17p deletion. Extension of indications can be expected in monotherapy and in combination regimens. Sensitivity to venetoclax is not common in lymphomas, but promising outcomes have been achieved in the mantle cell lymphoma group. Venetoclax is also active in multiple myeloma patients, especially in those with translocation t(11;14), even if high-risk features such as del17p are also present. Surprisingly, positive results are being obtained in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients, in whom inhibition of BCL2 is able to substantially increase the efficacy of low-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. Here, we provide a summary of available results from clinical trials and describe a specific mechanism of action that stands behind the efficacy of venetoclax in hematological malignancies.
Eukaryotic cells can die in many ways, including physiological and mostly beneficial modes of death (e.g., apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis), as well as nonphysiological and harmful necrotic cell destruction [
]. The classical form of cell death, apoptosis, is a gene-directed process of cell suicide characterized by specific biochemical and morphological changes including activation of proteolytic enzymes, caspases, cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing, chromatin condensation, and nuclear fragmentation. In this process, the cellular content is not released, so apoptosis is noninflammatory and the remaining apoptotic bodies are removed by phagocytes [
]. Apoptosis plays vital roles in embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, defense against pathogens, and elimination of neoplastic cells. However, deregulated apoptotic processes might promote the development of autoimmune, neurodegenerative, and oncologic diseases as well as resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy [
Apoptosis is triggered by two independent signaling pathways, intrinsic or extrinsic. Although both pathways in the last steps rely on the same executioner caspases (caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7), each pathway is activated differently [
]. The extrinsic pathway is set off by membrane death receptors belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily, which recognize their cognate extracellular ligands (e.g., FasR/FasL or CD95/CD95L, TNFR1/TNFα, DR3/TL1A, DR4/TRAIL-RI, and DR5/TRAIL-RII) [
]. Conversely, the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway is activated by excessive cellular stress and other pro-apoptotic events (e.g., heat, radiation, nutrient deprivation, viral infection, hypoxia, increased intracellular calcium concentration, and DNA mutations) and is orchestrated by proteins of the BCL2 family [
]. Each BCL2 family member harbors one or more BCL2 homology (BH) domains (BH1-4), that mediate protein–protein interactions. The BCL2 family is divided into two major functional groups. The first group includes the pro-apoptotic (pro-death) proteins BAD, BIK, NOXA, BMF, PUMA, BIM, BID, and HRK (BH3-only proteins) that activate the apoptotic effectors BAX and BAK. The second group contains the anti-apoptotic (prosurvival) proteins BCL2, BCL-XL, BCL-W, A1, and MCL-1 that bind and sequester members of the first group to prevent apoptosis. Mechanistically, when the cell receives the right signals to undergo apoptosis, the BH3-only proteins oligomerize with the effectors BAX and BAK and cause permeabilization of mitochondrial outer membrane. As a result, cytochrome c is released from mitochondria and activates caspase-dependent cell death [
Clearly, enhanced function of anti-apoptotic proteins would make cells more resistant to apoptosis induction. Indeed, deregulation of BCL2 and other anti-apoptotic proteins has been demonstrated to be an important resistance mechanism in solid tumors [
]. For instance, the main player, BCL2, is often overexpressed due to 18q21 translocations; for example, t(14;18)(q32;q21), which juxtaposes the BCL2 gene under the constitutive activation of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene promoter [
]. Alternatively, the cells can acquire an anti-apoptotic advantage indirectly via mechanisms involving tumor suppressor protein p53. As a transcription factor, p53 is able to induce transcription of BAX [
]. Therefore, mutations of the TP53 gene interfering with these p53 functions can inactivate mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Similarly, the proto-oncogene c-MYC regulates apoptosis by inducing expression of pro-apoptotic genes (BAX, BAK, BIM, PUMA and NOXA) [
]. However, in cancer cells that overexpress mutated c-MYC, the apoptotic safety mechanism is blocked by inappropriate expression of some anti-apoptotic molecules (BCL2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1) [
Because impaired apoptosis plays a key role in cancer resistance to therapy, pharmacologic inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins, especially BCL2, represents an attractive way to force clonal cells to die. Indeed, a number of chemical agents, the so-called BH3 mimetics, which are targeted to anti-apoptotic proteins, have been designed and tested in recent years. These drugs include nonselective inhibitors (AT-101, TW37, apogossypolone [ApoG2], obatoclax [GX15-070], ABT-737) and the BH3-only mimetic, navitoclax (ABT-263) [
A phase 2 study of the BH3 mimetic BCL2 inhibitor navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without rituximab, in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Apogossypolone, a nonpeptidic small molecule inhibitor targeting Bcl-2 family proteins, effectively inhibits growth of diffuse large cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo.
]. Although navitoclax binds effectively only to BCL2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1, its high affinity to BCL-XL limits its clinical use due to significant thrombocytopenia that restricts dose escalation and safe anticancer administration [
Substantial susceptibility of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to BCL2 inhibition: results of a phase I study of navitoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity inhibitor of BCL-2, in lymphoid malignancies: a phase 1 dose-escalation study of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity.
In this review, we focus on the highly selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax and its use in hematological malignancies. We present a brief summary of molecular mechanisms, principles of resistance, and main toxicities accompanied by an overview of available clinical studies (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6).
Table 1Results of phase 1 and 2 studies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Title
Regimen
EN
N
Condition
ORR% (N)
CR% (N)
PR% (N)
MRD
PFS
OS
Identifier, Phase (Reference)
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Venetoclax
116
116
RR CLL/SLL
79% (92/116)
20% (23/116)
NA
35% (6/17) BM
66% (15th mo)
84% (24th mo)
NCT01328626, Phase 1 (Roberts et al., 2016)
A Phase 2 Open-Label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Subjects With Relapse or Refractory to B-Cell Receptor Signaling Pathway Inhibitor Therapy
Venetoclax
120
64
RR CLL
70% (30/43)
2% (1/43) 0%
67% (29/43)
33% (14/42) PB
72% (12th mo)
90% (12th mo)
NCT02141282. Phase 2 (Jones et al., 2016a)
43
Ibrutinib arm
57% (10/21)
47% (10/21)
21
Idelalisib arm
A Study of the Efficacy of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With the 17p Deletion
Venetoclax
158
107
RR CLL/SLL
79% (85/107)
8% (8/107)
77% (77/107)
33% (6/18) BM
72% (12th mo)
87% (12th mo)
NCT01889186, Phase 2 (Stilgenbauer et al., 2016a)
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of ABT-199 in Combination With Rituximab in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Venetoclax
50
49
RR CLL
86% (42/49)
51% (25/49)
35% (17/49)
57% (28/49) BM
89% (24th mo)
NA
NCT01682616, Phase 1 (Seymour et al., 2017a)
Rituximab
CLARITY: Assessment of VenetoCLAx (ABT-199) in combination with IbRutInib in relapsed/refracTory Chronic LymphocYtic Leukaemia
Venetoclax
54
38
RR CLL
100% (38/38)
47% (18/38)
53% (20/38)
37% (15/38) PB
NA
NA
ISCRTN: 13751862, Phase 2 (Hillmen et al., 2017)
32% (12/38) BM
Ibrutinib
Venetoclax and Ibrutinib in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Venetoclax
78
14
RR CLL
100% (14/14)
64% (9/14)
35% (5/14)
NA
NA
NA
NCT02756897, Phase 2 (Jain et al., 2017)
Ibrutinib
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine in Combination With Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
389
194
RR CLL
93% (180/194)
27% (52/194)
67% (129/194)
84% (163/194) PB
84.9% (24th mo)
NA
NCT02005471, Phase 3 (Seymour et al., 2017b)
Rituximab
Bendamustin
194
68% (132/194)
8% (16/194)
60% (116/194)
23% (45/194) PB
36.3% (24th mo)
Rituximab
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Bendamustine + Rituximab or Bendamustine + Obinutuzumab in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Bcl-2 Inhibitor GDC-0199 in Combination With Obinutuzumab and Ibrutinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed, Refractory, or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
68
10
RR CLL
100% (10/10)
20% (2/10)
80% (8/10)
40% (4/10) BM
NA
NA
NCT02427451, Phase 1/2 (Jones et al., 2016b)
Ibrutinib
Obinutuzumab
Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine-Debulking Followed by ABT-199 and GA101-Induction and -Maintenance in CLL (CLL2-BAG)
Venetoclax
66
29
RR CLL
93% (27/29)
10% (3/29)
83% (24/29)
97% (33/34) PB
NA
NA
NCT02758665, Phase 2 (Cramer et al., 2017)
Bendamustin
Obinutuzumab
BM = bone marrow; EN = estimated enrollment; N = number of patients; MRD = minimal residual disease; NA = not available; PB = peripheral blood; SLL = small lymphocytic lymphoma.
Update data were presented at EHA 2017. MRD in peripheral blood evaluated in an entire cohort of 158 patients (RR and untreated).
A Study of the Efficacy of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously ND Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With the 17p Deletion
Venetoclax
158
5
ND CLL
80% (4/5)
40% (2/5)
NA
27% (42/158) PB
100% (12th mo)
100% (12th mo)
NCT01889186, Phase 2 (Stilgenbauer et al., 2017)
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Obinutuzumab in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
82
32
ND CLL
100% (32/32)
56% (17/32)
44% (14/32)
100% (32/32) PB 65% (20/32) BM
100% (12th mo)
NA
NCT01685892, Phase 1 (Flinn et al., 2017)
Obinutuzumab
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab + Venetoclax (GDC-0199) Versus Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
445
12
ND CLL
100% (12/12)
66% (8/12)
NA
100% (12/12) PB
NA
NCT02242942, Phase 3 (Fischer et al., 2016)
Obinutuzumab
Chlorambucil
Obinutuzumab
Venetoclax and Ibrutinib in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Venetoclax
78
16
ND CLL
100% (16/16)
56% (9/16)
44% (7/16)
NA
NA
NA
NCT02756897, Phase 2 (Jain et al., 2017)
Ibrutinib
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Bendamustine + Rituximab or Bendamustine + Obinutuzumab in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory or Previously ND Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Bcl-2 Inhibitor GDC-0199 in Combination With Obinutuzumab and Ibrutinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed, Refractory, or Previously ND Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
68
23
ND CLL
100% (23/23)
50% (12/24)
46% (11/23)
58% (14/23)
NA
NA
NCT02427451, Phase 1/2 (Rogers, et al., 2017)
Ibrutinib
Obinutuzumab
Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine-Debulking Followed by ABT-199 and GA101-Induction and -Maintenance in CLL (CLL2-BAG)
Venetoclax
66
34
ND CLL
100% (34/34)
9% (3/34)
91% (31/34)
12% (4/34) BM
NA
NA
NCT02758665, Phase 2 (Cramer et al. , 2017)
Bendamustin
Obinutuzumab
SLL = small lymphocytic lymphoma, NA = not available, EN = estimated enrollment, N = number of patients, MRD = minimal residual disease, PB = peripheral blood, BM = bone marrow, ND = newly diagnosed.
Update data were presented at EHA 2017. MRD in peripheral blood evaluated in an entire cohort of 158 patients (RR and ND).
Table 3Ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in RR and ND CLL
Title
Regimen
EN
Condition
Identifier
A Study Venetoclax in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Presence of 17p Deletion
Venetoclax
70
RR CLL
NCT02966756
Phase 2
A Study Evaluating Venetoclax in Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Whose Cancer Has Come Back or Who Had No Response to Previous Cancer Treatments Including Subjects Missing Part of Their Chromosome 17, or TP53 Gene Mutation; or Who Received Prior Treatment With a B-Cell Receptor Inhibitor
Venetoclax
200
RR CLL
NCT02980731
Phase 3
A Study of Venetoclax (GDC-0199; ABT-199) in Combination With Obinutuzumab in Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Venetoclax
81
RR CLL
NCT01685892
Obinutuzumab
Phase 1
Venetoclax and Ibrutinib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory CLL or SLL
Venetoclax
20
RR CLL/SLL
NCT03045328
Ibrutinib
Phase 2
Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Patients With Treatment-naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia /Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Venetoclax
150
ND CLL/SLL
NCT02910583
Ibrutinib
Phase 2
Sequential Regimen of Bendamustine-Debulking Followed by ABT-199 and GA101-Induction and -Maintenance in CLL (CLL2-BAG)
Venetoclax
66
RR CLL
NCT02401503
ND CLL
Phase 2
Bendamustin
Obinutuzumab
Bcl-2 Inhibitor GDC-0199 in Combination With Obinutuzumab and Ibrutinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed, Refractory, or Previously ND Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
MRD was evaluated either from bone marrow or peripheral blood.
NCT02427451
Ibrutinib
ND CLL
Phase 1
Obinutuzumab
Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax Plus Obinutuzumab in Patients With CLL (CLL2-GiVe)
Venetoclax
40
ND CLL
NCT02758665
Ibrutinib
Phase 2
Obinutuzumab
Standard Chemoimmunotherapy (FCR/BR) Versus Rituximab + Venetoclax (RVe) Versus Obinutuzumab (GA101) + Venetoclax (GVe) Versus Obinutuzumab + Ibrutinib + Venetoclax (GIVe) in Fit Patients With Previously ND Chronic Lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) Without Del (17p) or TP53 Mutation (GAIA)
FCR
920
ND CLL
NCT02950051
BR
Phase 3
Venetoclax
Rituximab
Venetoclax
Obinutuzumab
Venetoclax
Ibrutinib
Obinutuzumab
SLL = small lymphocytic lymphoma, EN = estimated enrollment, N = number of patients, ND = newly diagnosed.
a MRD was evaluated either from bone marrow or peripheral blood.
Table 4Results of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials in NHL, MM, and AML
Title
Regimen
EN
N
Condition
ORR% (N)
CR% (N)
PR% (N)
PFS (median)
OS (1-year)
Identifier, Phase (Reference)
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Venetoclax
106
106
RR NHL
44% (47/106)
13% (14/106)
31% (33/106)
6 m
70%
NCT01328626, Phase 1 (Davids et al., 2017)
14 m
82%
28
MCL
75% (21/28)
21% (6/28)
54% (15/28)
11 m
100%
1 m
32%
29
FL
38% (11/29)
14% (4/29)
24% (7/29)
NA
NA
NA
NA
34
DLBCL
18% (6/34)
12% (4/34)
6% (2/34)
NA
NA
7
RT
43% (3/7)
0%
43% (3/7)
4
WM
100% (4/4)
0%
100% (4/4)
3
MZL
67% (2/3)
0%
67% (2/3)
A Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of GDC-0199 (ABT-199) in Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Venetoclax
248
21
NHL RR/Untreated
86% (18/21)
67% (14/21)
14% (3/21)
NA
NA
NCT02055820, Phase 1 (Zelenetz et al., 2016)
R-CHOP
Venetoclax
21
81% (17/21)
62% (13/21)
19% (4/21)
G-CHOP
ABT-199 & Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (AIM) (AIM)
Venetoclax
24
23
RR MCL
71% (17/24)
63% (15/24)
17% (4/24)
NA
NA
NCT02471391, Phase 2 (Tam et al., 2017)
Ibrutinib
1
ND MCL
Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory MM
Venetoclax
84
66
RR MM
21% (14/66)
6% (4/66)
15% (10/66)
NA
NA
NCT01794520, Phase 1 (Kumar et al., 2016)
Venetoclax
Dexamethasone
A Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Multiple Myeloma Subjects Who Are Receiving Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Standard Therapy
Venetoclax
66
66
RR MM
68% (44/65)
17% (11/66)
51% (33/66)
NA
NA
NCT01794507, Phase 1 (Moreau et al., 2016)
Bortezomib
Dexamethasone
A Study Evaluating Venetoclax in Combination With Low-Dose Cytarabine in Treatment-Naïve Subjects With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
Venetoclax
91
61
Elderly ND AML
61% (37/61)
62% (38/61)
2% (1/61)
NA
46%
NCT02287233, Phase 1/2 (Wei et al., 2017)
LD-Cytarabine
Phase 1b Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Study With ABT-199 + Decitabine or Azacitidine (Chemo Combo)
Venetoclax
260
145
Elderly ND AML
68% (97/145)
NA
NA
17.5 m
NA
NCT02203773, Phase 1 (DiNardo et al., 2017)
5-Azacitidine
Venetoclax
Decitabine
EN = estimated enrollment, LD = low-dose, ND = newly diagnosed, N = number of patients.
Table 5Ongoing clinical trials in NHL, MM, and AML
Title
Regimen
EN
Condition
Identifier
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0199 Plus Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) in Comparison With BR or GDC-0199 Plus Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed and Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (fNHL)
Venetoclax
165
RR FL
NCT02187861
Phase 2
Rituximab
Venetoclax
BR
BR
Ibrutinib and Venetoclax in Relapsed and Refractory Follicular Lymphoma
Venetoclax
41
RR FL
NCT02956382
Ibrutinib
Phase 2
Combination of Obinutuzumab and Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL
Venetoclax
21
RR DLBCL
NCT02987400
Obinutuzumab
Phase 2
Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory MM
Venetoclax
40
RR MM
NCT02899052
Carfilzomib
Phase 2
Dexamethasone
Study of Ibrutinib Combined With Venetoclax in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (SYMPATICO)
Venetoclax
287
RR MCL
NCT03112174
Venetoclax
Phase 3
Ibrutinib
Ibrutinib
MM
A Study Evaluating Venetoclax (ABT-199) in Multiple Myeloma Subjects Who Are Receiving Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Standard Therapy
Venetoclax
240
RR MM
NCT02755597
Bortezomib
Phase 3
Dexamethasone
Placebo
Bortezomib
Dexamethasone
Acute myeloid leukemia
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine in Treatment Naïve Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy
Venetoclax
400
Elderly
NCT02993523
5-Azacitidine
ND AML
Phase 3
Placebo
5-Azacitidine
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Low Dose Cytarabine Versus Low Dose Cytarabine Alone in Treatment Naïve Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy
Venetoclax
175
Elderly
NCT03069352
LD-Cytarabine
ND AML
Phase 3
Placebo
LD-Cytarabine
Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor Venetoclax in Combination With Standard Intensive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Induction/Consolidation Therapy With FLAG-IDA in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Venetoclax
56
ND or RR AML
NCT03214562
FLAG-IDA
Phase 1/2
A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Cobimetinib and Venetoclax in Combination With Idasanutlin in Patients Aged >/=60 Years With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Not Eligible for Cytotoxic Therapy
Venetoclax (ABT-199, GDC-0199, Venclexta™) is a unique, small, and highly selective orally bioavailable molecule that was designed to target specifically the BH3 domain of BCL2 [
]. As a BH3 mimetic, venetoclax displays a high affinity to the BH3-binding groove of BCL2 and is able to displace pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins (e.g., BIM) bound to BCL2. Therefore, free BH3-only proteins can activate apoptotic effectors (BAX and BAK) or inhibit other anti-apoptotic members (MCL-1). Therefore, venetoclax triggers and restores apoptosis in tumor cells by releasing pro-apoptotic proteins from BCL2 [
Figure 1In cancer cells, the anti-apoptotic protein BCL22 sequesters and blocks the function of BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g., BIM) and therefore prevents apoptosis. The BH3-only mimetic compound venetoclax displaces and reactivates pro-apoptotic proteins bound to the BH3-binding groove of BCL2. Consequently, released pro-apoptotic proteins associate with the apoptotic effectors BAX and BAK and induce permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Cytochrome c released from mitochondria then activates caspases and triggers cell death.
Evaluation of rifampin's transporter inhibitory and CYP3A inductive effects on the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor: results of a single- and multiple-dose study.
]. Concomitant therapy with strong CYP3A inhibitors or P-glycoprotein inhibitors should be avoided, but if they are necessary, then venetoclax reduction is required (≥75% and 50% dose reduction in concomitant use of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibitors). There is only minimal excretion of the intact drug in urine [
]. Although it is an indolent malignancy, its clinical course is variable and prognosis is predicted according to present genetic lesions. More than 80% of CLL cases have classified genomic aberrations, including the most frequent deletions (del)13q (55%), del11q (18%), del17p (8%), and trisomy 12 (12–16%) [
Randomized phase III trial of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide with or without oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense) in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
]. Another reason for BCL2 overexpression is the loss of the tumor suppressor genes microRNA 15 (miR15) and miR16, which are located on the 13q14 chromosome region. miR15 and miR16 interact directly with and inhibit BCL2 and several other oncogenes (e.g., MCL1 and BMl1). Therefore, del 13q14 results in the loss of miR15 and miR16 function and enables increase of BCL2 protein in 50% of CLL patients [
In April 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved venetoclax as monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL with del17p. The overall response rate (ORR) in the initial phase 1 study in patients with RR CLL/SLL (median of three previous therapies) was achieved by 79% (92/116) and complete remission (CR) occurred in 20% (23/116). Almost no differences were observed in the subgroup of patients with del17p (ORR and CR were 71% [22/31] and 16% [5/31], respectively) Progression-free survival (PFS) at 15 months was estimated to be 66% (median PFS was 16 months for CLL with del17p and median PFS was not reached for CLL with unmutated chromosome 17) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) for all cohorts was 84%. Compared with other options for RR CLL, 68% and 63% of patients responded to bendamustin plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib, respectively, and 83% with del17p response to ibrutinib monotherapy. Clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurred in three cases, with one death after step-up to 1200 mg per day. Other most common serious adverse events (AEs) (grade 3–4) were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, and immune thrombocytopenia [
]. In a phase 2 study, 107 patients with RR CLL (median of two previous therapies) with del17p received venetoclax in monotherapy. Response occurred in 79% (85/107), with 8% (8/107) achieving CR. One-year PFS and OS were 72% and 87%, respectively [
]. Another phase 2 study assessed the efficacy of venetoclax monotherapy in the treatment of patients who relapsed after, or were refractory to, a B-cell receptor inhibitor (idelalisib or ibrutinib). In arm A (prior ibrutinib for a median of 17 months), 70% (30/43) of patients responded to the administered drug and 2% (1/43) achieved CR; 57% (10/21) patients in arm B (prior idelalisib for a median of 8 months) responded with partial remission (PR) as the best response. One-year PFS and OS were 72% and 90%, respectively, for all patients. The majority of both arms were refractory to ibrutinib (91%) or idelalisib (67%). Hematological toxicity (neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia), febrile neutropenia, and pneumonia were the most common grade 3–4 AEs [
Venetoclax in combination with rituximab was investigated in a phase 1 study in RR CLL (median of two previous therapies) and the combination regimen was effective in 86% (42/49) of patients, with 51% (25/49) obtaining CR. The 2-year estimated PFS and OS were 82% and 89%, respectively. Toxicity appeared to be similar to venetoclax in monotherapy, including two clinical significant TLS cases, one of which ended in death [
]. Promising outcomes were obtained by untreated and RR CLL patients (median of one previous therapy) who were administered obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. At the time of data analysis, 10 RR patients had completed eight cycles (ORR and CR were 100% [10/10] and 20% [2/10], respectively) [
]. Observed toxicities for the combination were consistent with those reported for the single agents, with neutropenia, lymphopenia, hypertension, and fatigue as the most common AEs and no cases of TLS [
]. Untreated and RR CLL (median of one previous therapy) were enrolled in a phase 1 study of standard chemoimmunotherapy: BR combined with venetoclax. In the group of untreated and RR CLL, ORR reached 100% (14/14) and 96% (26/27) with 43% (6/14) and 26% (7/27) of CR, respectively. In the same study, bendamustin plus obinutuzumab (BG) and venetoclax were administered to seven untreated CLL patients with similar outcomes to BR plus venetoclax (ORR 100%, CR 43% [3/7]). Hematologic toxicity was the most serious across all groups and diarrhea with fatigue appeared most often as a nonhematologic toxicity [
Phase Ib study (GO28440) of venetoclax with bendamustine/rituximab or bendamustine/obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory or previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
]. Outcomes of a phase 2 study with the same combination (BG plus venetoclax) were presented at the European Haematology Association (EHA) 2017 meeting. Responses were similar to the phase 1 study (ORR 100% [34/34] and 93% [27/29], CR 9% [3/34] and 10% [3/29] for untreated and RR CLL, respectively). More AEs occurred in the RR cohort than in untreated patients [
Bendamustine (B), followed by obinutuzumab (G, GA101) and venetoclax (A, ABT-199) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): CLL2-BAG Phase-II-trial of the German CLL study group (GCLLSG) EHA Learning Center.
]. A randomized phase 3 trial (CLL14) compares the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab and venetoclax with obinutuzumab and chlorambucil in patients with previously untreated CLL with coexisting medical conditions (CIRS > 6). Response was obtained by all patients, with 66% (8/12) of patients obtaining CR and neither progression nor death at 15 months of treatment monitored [
Safety and efficacy of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting medical conditions: final results of the run-in phase of the randomized CLL14 Trial (BO25323.
]. Early results of phase 2 study in RR CLL (median of two previous therapies) suggest a potent synergy between ibrutinib and venetoclax (ORR and CR were 100% [38/38] and 47% [18/38], respectively) with acceptable toxicity and TLS only in two patients thus far [
Initial results of ibrutinib plus venetoclax in relapsed, refractory CLL (Bloodwise TAP CLARITY Study): high rates of overall response, complete remission and MRD eradication after 6 months of combination therapy.
]. Similar results were achieved in RR patients (ORR and CR were 100% [14/14] and 64% [9/14], respectively) and untreated patients (ORR and CR were 100% [19/19] and 56% [9/16], respectively) in another trial with the same combination [
There is an ongoing phase 3 trial comparing a combination regimen of venetoclax plus monoclonal antibody (rituximab or obinutuzumab) or venetoclax, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab with standard chemoimmunotherapy, BR and FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab). All available results of completed and ongoing clinical trials are summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3.
Mantle cell lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is usually represented as an aggressive B-cell lymphoma developing from naive B cells [
]. Despite the presence of this aberration, additional genetic changes (loss of tumor suppressor genes TP53, ATM, and CDKN2A or gain of oncogenes BCL2, C-MYC, SYK) are usually required for malignant transformation [
]. Benz et al. identified amplification of the 18q21–22 locus in several cases and also pointed out the presence of del13q14 that was shown to be responsible for BCL2 activation in CLL [
In an initial phase 1 study of RR non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (106 patients), the cohort of RR MCL (median of three previous therapies) was one of the best responding groups achieving ORR and CR in 75% (21/28) and 21% (6/28), respectively. One-year OS was demonstrated in 82% and median PFS was 14 months. The most common grade 3–4 toxicity was hematological (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and only a few cases of hyponatremia and infections (lower respiratory tract infection and influenza) occurred during treatment. No clinical TLS was observed [
]. The combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib was investigated in a phase 2 study in RR MCL (95%, median of two previous therapies, 30% failed to autologous stem cell transplantation) and untreated MCL (5%). ORR and CR were achieved in 71% (17/24) and 63% (15/24) of all patients and estimates of PFS and OS were 74% and 81%, respectively, at 8 months. TLS occurred in two cases with high tumor burden, leading to revision of the protocol (venetoclax starting dose from 50 to 20 mg per day) [
Combination ibrutinib (Ibr) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): primary endpoint assessment of the phase 2 AIM study.
]. A phase 3 trial comparing venetoclax plus ibrutinib with ibrutinib or venetoclax monotherapy is ongoing (Table 5).
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma morphologically classified by the diffuse growth of mature neoplastic large B lymphoid cells [
]. It comprises several distinct histologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic subgroups. The most common aberrations involve mutations of the BCL6 (30%), BCL2 (20–30%), and c-MYC (5–22%) genes [
]. Double-hit DLBCL is a subgroup with poor clinical outcome that harbors concurrent gene rearrangement of c-MYC and the BCL2, BCL6, or BCL3 proto-oncogene. It represents less than 10% of DLBCL, with the most frequent MYC/BCL2 subtype carrying translocation of c-MYC and t(14;18)(q32;q21) [
In a phase 1 study, venetoclax monotherapy was administered to 34 patients with RR DLBCL (median of three previous therapies). The drug was effective in 18% (6/34) and 12% (4/34) of patients reached CR. However, the responses did not last long and were the shortest among all types of RR NHL. Median PFS was 1 month and 1-year OS was achieved by 12%. Venetoclax was well tolerated and no TLS was observed [
Preliminary data of combination therapy, venetoclax plus R-CHOP/G-CHOP (rituximab/obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) were published at ASH 2016. Patients (24 follicular lymphoma [FL], 17 DLBCL, five marginal zone lymphoma [MZL], 10 others) with untreated disease (91%) or RR disease (9%, one previous therapy) were enrolled. Demonstrated results were presented for all NHL (untreated and RR) types together and they were nearly the same in both cohorts (R-CHOP and G-CHOP). Patients treated with venetoclax plus R-CHOP achieved ORR and CR in 86% (18/21) and 67% (14/21) of patients, respectively, and in the arm with venetoclax plus G-CHOP, ORR and CR were 81% (17/21) and 62% (13/21), respectively. Toxicity seemed to be higher than in venetoclax monotherapy and mainly presented as neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia without TLS [
Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large-cell lymphoma: alternative patterns with increased or decreased expression of c-myc and its regulated genes.
In a phase 1 study of RR NHL, venetoclax in monotherapy was given to 29 patients with RR FL (median of three previous therapies). Treatment was successful in 38% (11/29) and 14% (4/29) of CRs were observed. All patients were alive in the first year and the estimated median PFS was 11 months. Toxicity was acceptable and similar to all groups/types of NHL [
Combination of venetoclax plus standard immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP/G-CHOP) was investigated in a phase 1 study in 24 patients with untreated or RR FL (one previous therapy). Preliminary results were published for the whole cohort of NHL together. ORR and CR were 86% (18/21) and 67% (14/21) versus 81% (17/21) and 62% (13/21), respectively, in venetoclax plus R-CHOP versus enetoclax plus G-CHOP. Most common grade 3–4 AEs (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopaenia) occurred more frequently than in venetoclax monotherapy [
]. Finally, several studies with rituximab, ibrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab were designed to find the best combination for venetoclax (Table 5).
MZL
MZL is an indolent lymphoma that arises from memory B cells that are present in the marginal zone of lymphoid tissue. Chromosomal changes such as trisomy 3, trisomy 18, and t(11;18)(q21;q21) are commonly seen in the extranodal subtype and other specific mutations such as t(1;14)(p22;q32), t(14;18)(q32;q21), t(3;14)(p14;q32) and del17p13 are recorded only rarely [
Several subtypes of MZL are BCL2 positive (nodal and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue), whereas others (splenic) are negative [
], but little is known about the pathogenesis of BCL2 expression in MZL. In the initial study for RR NHL, venetoclax has shown efficacy in 67% (2/3) of patients, with PR as the best response. To correctly interpret outcomes of venetoclax treatment, a bigger cohort of patients must be assessed [
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell neoplasm manifested by accumulation of the monoclonal immunoglobulin M secreted by lymphoplasmacytic cells. Malignancy is associated with somatic mutations of MYD88 and CXCR4 in 90% and 30% of cases, respectively [
The genomic landscape of Waldenström macroglobulinemia is characterized by highly recurring MYD88 and WHIM-like CXCR4 mutations, and small somatic deletions associated with B-cell lymphomagenesis.
]. Subsequently, venetoclax demonstrated effective induction of apoptosis alone and in combination with either ibrutinib or idelalisib ex vivo (including WM cells with CXCR4 mutation), so it is speculated that it will be able to overcome the resistance of CXCR4-mutated WM in vivo as well [
The BCL2 antagonist ABT-199 triggers apoptosis, and augments ibrutinib and idelalisib mediated cytotoxicity in CXCR4 wild-type and CXCR4 WHIM mutated Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia cells.
]. All four RR WM patients (median of four previous therapies) responded to venetoclax monotherapy, with PR as the best response. Toxicity was the same as in the whole group of NHL [
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous malignant disorder caused by the proliferation and accumulation of clonal plasma cells and is almost always associated with the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulin in the serum and/or urine [
MM is a heterogeneous disease due to its dependence on anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL2, BCL_XLL, or MCL-1 and it is currently not known what proportion of MM patients are likely to be BCL2 dependent [
]. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated in MM cell lines and primary patient samples that venetoclax is highly effective in a specific subset of MM with translocation t(11;14), mainly due to the higher BCL2/MCL-1 mRNA ratio. Interestingly, venetoclax remains active in this subgroup of MM even if the high-risk 17p deletion is present [
]. Moreover, it has been shown that this drug works synergistically with dexamethasone and is able to increase the expression of BCL2 and BIM, so MM cells become more sensitive to venetoclax [
In a phase 1 clinical trial with venetoclax monotherapy, 66 RR MM patients with a median of five previous therapies were enrolled overall. The ORR for all patients was 21% (14/66), with 15% (10/66) reaching very good partial response (VGPR, decrease of more than 90% of M-protein) or better. In the subset of MM patients with t(11;14), ORR was 40% (12/30), with 27% (8/30) achieving VGPR or better. Conversely, in patients without t(11;14), almost no responses were observed (ORR: 6%) [
]. In another phase 1b trial, the combination of venetoclax with bortezomib and dexamethasone was investigated in the cohort of 66 RRMM patients with a median of three previous therapies. The ORR was 67% for all patients (44/66), with 42% (28/66) of patients reaching VGPR or better. The ORR for patients with or without t(11;14) was 78% versus 65% and with or without del(17p) was 47% versus 73%, respectively. Venetoclax alone or in combination had an acceptable safety profile in both of these phase 1 trials, with the most common AEs grade 3/4 being thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and infectious complications [
]. There is an ongoing phase 3 clinical trial comparing bortezomib and dexamethasone plus venetoclax versus bortezomib and dexamethasone plus placebo (Table 5).
Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a biologically heterogeneous clonal disorder of undifferentiated myeloid precursors resulting in impaired hematopoiesis and bone marrow failure [
]. Overexpression of this anti-apoptotic protein is also implicated in chemotherapy resistance, even though the mechanism of overexpression has not yet been fully described [
]. The first evidence of venetoclax efficacy was proposed by Pan et al., who demonstrated selective blast killing in AML cell lines, primary patient samples, and murine primary xenografts by this agent [
Preclinical studies revealed that patients with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase proteins 1 and 2 (IDH 1/2, approximately 15% of AML) are more likely to respond to BCL2 inhibition by venetoclax [
]. In the first clinical trial investigating venetoclax monotherapy (800 mg daily) in 32 high-risk RR AML patients, the ORR was 19%. However, 38% (12/32) had IDH 1/2 mutations, of whom 33% (4/12) reached CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), confirming this preclinical finding. Common AEs grade 3/4 included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and hypokalemia [
]. Preclinical investigation (by RNA interference drug modifier screens) identified the potential synergistic role of BCL2 family protein inhibitors with 5-azacytidine (5-Aza). Preliminary results of the phase 1 clinical trial investigating the combination of venetoclax plus either 5-Aza or decitabine in newly diagnosed >65-year-old AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were presented at ASH 2017. Overall, 145 patients were enrolled in four arms (comparing 400 or 800 mg doses of venetoclax with each hypomethylating agent), with the ORR being 67% (97/145).The median OS in all patients was 17.5 months. The emerging clinical and exposure response data demonstrated that 400 mg venetoclax has the best benefit-risk profile. A phase 3 study of 400 mg venetoclax combined with AZA is under way. The most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic toxicities and febrile neutropenia [
]. Another logical combination of venetoclax is with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); this is considered as a current standard of care in the elderly AML patient population, with an expected ORR of maximum 20%. Sixty-one patients were enrolled in a phase 1/2 study with 600 mg venetoclax; 62% (38/61) of these patients achieved CR/CRi with a median duration of CR/CRi of 14.9 months. Treatment-emergent grade 3/4 AEs (in ≥20% of 61 patients) were thrombocytopenia (59%), neutropenia (46%), febrile neutropenia (36%), and anemia (28%). One case (2%) of TLS occurred [
Phase 1/2 study of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: 1-year outcomes.
]. These promising results led to the initiation of randomized phase 3 trials that are currently ongoing. One compares venetoclax plus 5-Aza versus 5-Aza alone; the other one compares venetoclax plus LDAC versus LDAC alone (Table 5).
Conclusions
The intrinsic apoptotic pathway deregulated due to the overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins is found in a variety of tumor types. It has been demonstrated that the blockade of these proteins leading to the release of pro-apoptotic proteins might restart the process of cell suicide in malignant cells. To date, the most effective molecule is venetoclax, the BH3-only mimetic and the first selective BCL2 inhibitor. It has been approved for RR CLL patients with del17p in monotherapy. However, expanded indications may be assumed in this malignancy. FL was another lymphoproliferative disease with expected efficacy according to a high rate of t(14;18)(q32;q21) in malignant cells (80–90%). Nevertheless, the results of venetoclax monotherapy are not that promising, with responses in less than half of RR FL [
]. Venetoclax is also active in MM patients, especially in those with translocation t(11;14), and represents an available biomarker predicting the efficacy of this drug. Quite striking results were obtained in elderly AML patients, in whom venetoclax in combination with LDAC or hypomethylating agents (5-Aza or decitabine) induced approximately 60–70% of responses (taking into account that, in the current standard of care, LDAC does not induce more than 20% of responses), resulting in the initiation of phase 3 clinical trials.
The venetoclax toxicity profile was found to be acceptable across all studies. Initially, there was a concern about TLS, but this is well manageable with the recommended prophylactic procedures. Typically, it has occurred in CLL with two deaths demonstrated to date (venetoclax monotherapy at 1200 mg and venetoclax plus rituximab at 50 mg) [
]. To mitigate the risk, a dose ramp-up period (initial dose of 20 mg in CLL and 50 mg in NHL with dose escalation every week during the first months), along with prophylactic hydration and urate lowering therapy, is recommended [
]. Relatively frequent hematological toxicity might be explained by the presence of anti-apoptotic members in the immature stages of hematopoietic cells during their maturation. Anti-apoptotic proteins let immature cells survive and differentiate into mature forms [
], but this process is interrupted prematurely when anti-apoptotic inhibitors are administered. Grade of cytopenia depends on both the selectivity of the inhibitor and the ratio of protein members (BCL/MCL-1 and BCL2/BCL-XL). For instance, it has been proven that venetoclax does not induce limiting thrombocytopenia because megakaryopoesis is controlled by the BCL-XL protein [
]. Therefore, it is of high importance to establish additional prognostic markers that can predict the sensitivity to venetoclax and further explore potential resistance mechanisms, which will be likely diverse in individual groups of patients. Given the high venetoclax specificity to BCL2, upregulated BCL-XL and MCL1 can sequester proapoptotic protein BIM and lead to resistance [
]. Preclinical data indicate that BCL2/BCL-XL and BCL2/MCL1 ratios could be used in response prediction and thus should be included in routine clinical pipelines. Interestingly, low expression of miR-377 was inversely correlated with high expression of BCL-XL and might also be of potential prognostic importance [
Bcl-2 phosphorylation confers resistance on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells to the BH3 mimetics ABT-737, ABT-263 and ABT-199 by impeding direct binding.
], which displace BIM from BCL2 or prevent inhibitor binding. The complexity of venetoclax resistance in B-cell malignancies has been broadly described in other studies [
The ratio of different anti-apoptotic proteins within malignant cells has an impact on venetoclax resistance. The combination of different molecules such as some of the B-cell receptor inhibitors is being used to try to solve this issue. For example, ibrutinib (a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor) mobilizes lymphocytes expressing BCL-XL and A1 (dominantly) from lymph nodes into the peripheral blood. In circulation, clonal cells lose protecting microenvironment signals, reduce BCL-XL and A1, and increase BCL2 protein expression [
The initial report of the bloodwise tap clarity study combining ibrutinib and venetoclax in relapsed, refractory cll shows acceptable safety and promising early indications of efficacy.
Expression profile of BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1 predicts pharmacological response to the BCL-2 selective antagonist venetoclax in multiple myeloma models.
]. Various other kinase inhibitors such as entospletinib (GS-9973), sunitinib (SU11248), cerdulatinib (PRT062070), CC-115 (TORK and DNA-PK inhibitor), and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK2, CDK9), are able to block MCL-1 and might become the right partners for venetoclax treatment [
Clinical and correlative results of a phase 1 study of cerdulatinib (PRT062070) a dual SYK/JAK inhibitor in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies.
]. A therapeutic challenge is double-hit DLBCL expressing BCL2 but also other anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g., MCL-1 and BCL-XL) that have been effectively blocked by combination of venetoclax plus carfilzomib, 5-Aza, or BR101801 (PI3K and DNA-PK inhibitor) in some in vitro studies [
In conclusion, venetoclax is a targeted drug with a novel mechanism of action that has already demonstrated highly promising activity in a variety of hematological malignancies. Due to its effect on the restoration of the apoptotic pathway, it can also be used successfully in patients with high-risk genetic features and nonfunctional p53. Taking all this and its low toxicity into consideration, venetoclax might become an important part of the treatment armamentarium against a substantial number of blood cancers.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Shira Timilsina, M.D., for English language editing and Michal Kupka, M.D., for illustrations.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health (DRO-FNOs/2017) and the Ministry of Health [17-30089A); the Institutional Development Plan of University of Ostrava [IRP201550), SGS18/PrF/2017–2018; and Strengthening International Cooperation in Science, Research and Education (project ID: 01211/2016/RRC).
References
Fink S.L.
Cookson B.T.
Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells.
A phase 2 study of the BH3 mimetic BCL2 inhibitor navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without rituximab, in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Apogossypolone, a nonpeptidic small molecule inhibitor targeting Bcl-2 family proteins, effectively inhibits growth of diffuse large cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo.
Substantial susceptibility of chronic lymphocytic leukemia to BCL2 inhibition: results of a phase I study of navitoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity inhibitor of BCL-2, in lymphoid malignancies: a phase 1 dose-escalation study of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity.
Evaluation of rifampin's transporter inhibitory and CYP3A inductive effects on the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor: results of a single- and multiple-dose study.
Randomized phase III trial of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide with or without oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense) in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Phase Ib study (GO28440) of venetoclax with bendamustine/rituximab or bendamustine/obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory or previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Bendamustine (B), followed by obinutuzumab (G, GA101) and venetoclax (A, ABT-199) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): CLL2-BAG Phase-II-trial of the German CLL study group (GCLLSG) EHA Learning Center.
Safety and efficacy of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting medical conditions: final results of the run-in phase of the randomized CLL14 Trial (BO25323.
Initial results of ibrutinib plus venetoclax in relapsed, refractory CLL (Bloodwise TAP CLARITY Study): high rates of overall response, complete remission and MRD eradication after 6 months of combination therapy.
Combination ibrutinib (Ibr) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): primary endpoint assessment of the phase 2 AIM study.
Transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large-cell lymphoma: alternative patterns with increased or decreased expression of c-myc and its regulated genes.
The genomic landscape of Waldenström macroglobulinemia is characterized by highly recurring MYD88 and WHIM-like CXCR4 mutations, and small somatic deletions associated with B-cell lymphomagenesis.
The BCL2 antagonist ABT-199 triggers apoptosis, and augments ibrutinib and idelalisib mediated cytotoxicity in CXCR4 wild-type and CXCR4 WHIM mutated Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia cells.
Phase 1/2 study of venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: 1-year outcomes.
Bcl-2 phosphorylation confers resistance on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells to the BH3 mimetics ABT-737, ABT-263 and ABT-199 by impeding direct binding.
The initial report of the bloodwise tap clarity study combining ibrutinib and venetoclax in relapsed, refractory cll shows acceptable safety and promising early indications of efficacy.
Expression profile of BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1 predicts pharmacological response to the BCL-2 selective antagonist venetoclax in multiple myeloma models.
Clinical and correlative results of a phase 1 study of cerdulatinib (PRT062070) a dual SYK/JAK inhibitor in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies.