Experimental Hematology
Volume 38, Issue 7 , Pages 581-592 , July 2010

Stem cell plasticity revisited: The continuum marrow model and phenotypic changes mediated by microvesicles

  • Peter J. Quesenberry

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI., USA
  • ,
  • Mark S. Dooner

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI., USA
  • ,
  • Jason M. Aliotta

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI., USA
    • Division of Pulmonary, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI., USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationOffprint requests to: Jason M. Aliotta, M.D., Division of Hematology/Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Floor George Building, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903

Received 27 February 2010 ,Revised 27 February 2010 ,Accepted 31 March 2010.

  • Image Result

    Population model of stem cell phenotype. Numbers and circles represent different phenotypic cell classes. The concept here is that the phenotypes change at different points in cell cycle and eventuall

    Population model of stem cell phenotype. Numbers and circles represent different phenotypic cell classes. The concept here is that the phenotypes change at different points in cell cycle and eventually return to the original phenotype. For example, cell #1 is a long-term repopulating cell in G2/M/G0 and becomes a different cell in G1, a colony-forming unit megakaryocyte (CFU-Meg) in S phase, then returns to the original phenotype. In this model, the individual cell phenotype continuously changes while the population remains stable. CLP = common lymphoid progenitor; ETC = et cetera.

  • Image Result
    Marrow conversion to epithelial lung cell. This shows conversion of a marrow stem cell phenotype to a pulmonary epithelial cell, which is affected by host irradiation, treatment of host or exogenous m

    Marrow conversion to epithelial lung cell. This shows conversion of a marrow stem cell phenotype to a pulmonary epithelial cell, which is affected by host irradiation, treatment of host or exogenous marrow cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell phenotype.

  • Image Result
    Marrow-lung coculture. Marrow cells were cocultured across from lung fragments but separated from them by a cell impermeable (0.4 μm) membrane for 2 or 7 days and expression of pulmonary epithelial ge

    Marrow-lung coculture. Marrow cells were cocultured across from lung fragments but separated from them by a cell impermeable (0.4 μm) membrane for 2 or 7 days and expression of pulmonary epithelial genes in marrow cells determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis.

  • Image Result
    Lung-derived microvesicles. (A−D) shows a marrow cell with incorporated PKH26 and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimyl ester−labeled lung-derived microvesicles. (A) merged image; (B) DAPI filter; (

    Lung-derived microvesicles. (AD) shows a marrow cell with incorporated PKH26 and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimyl ester−labeled lung-derived microvesicles. (A) merged image; (B) DAPI filter; (C) Texas Red filter; (D) fluorescein isothiocyanate filter. (E) An electron micrograph of fluorescent-activated cell sorting-sorted lung-derived microvesicles. Red bar = 10 μm; black bar = 100 nm.

  • Image Result
    Injury induction of microvesicles. Irradiation injures a nonhematopoietic cell that releases bioactive microvesicles containing protein, messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA. These microvesicles enter ma

    Injury induction of microvesicles. Irradiation injures a nonhematopoietic cell that releases bioactive microvesicles containing protein, messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA. These microvesicles enter marrow cells and alter their phenotype to that of the cell of microvesicle origin.

  • Image Result
    Effect of microvesicles on the stem cell population model. This indicates that microvesicles impose a different order of phenotypic change on stem cells progressing through a cell-cycle−related stem c

    Effect of microvesicles on the stem cell population model. This indicates that microvesicles impose a different order of phenotypic change on stem cells progressing through a cell-cycle−related stem cell continuum. CLP = common lymphoid progenitor; ETC = et cetera.

  • Image Result
    Stem cell modulogram. Stem cells progressing though cycle continuously change individual cell phenotypes while maintaining the population phenotype. This is further modulated by microvesicle cell entr

    Stem cell modulogram. Stem cells progressing though cycle continuously change individual cell phenotypes while maintaining the population phenotype. This is further modulated by microvesicle cell entry and the final cell fate determined by interactions with different microenvironments.

  • Image Result
    Concepts of stem cell plasticity. Panel 1 indicates that marrow-derived microvesicles may enter lung cells and induce marrow characteristics in the lung cells. Panel 2 indicates than lung-derived micr

    Concepts of stem cell plasticity. Panel 1 indicates that marrow-derived microvesicles may enter lung cells and induce marrow characteristics in the lung cells. Panel 2 indicates than lung-derived microvesicles may enter marrow cells and alter their phenotype toward that of a lung cell.

PII: S0301-472X(10)00143-8

doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.03.021

Experimental Hematology
Volume 38, Issue 7 , Pages 581-592 , July 2010