Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 879-886 (August 2009)


View previous. 2 of 14 View next.

Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in multiple myeloma: Identification of potential therapeutic targets

Nicola GiulianiCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, Marcellina Mangoni, Vittorio Rizzoli

Received 16 March 2009; received in revised form 10 April 2009; accepted 20 April 2009. published online 27 April 2009.

Objective

Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells toward osteoprogenitor and osteoblastic cells is tightly regulated by several growth and transcription factors at the molecular level. In this article, we focus on the biological mechanisms involved in the osteoblast inhibition induced by myeloma cells.

Materials and Methods

Current research on the mechanisms regulating myeloma cell and osteoprogenitor cells interactions and on potential therapeutic targets to treat multiple myeloma bone disease is reviewed.

Results

Runt-related transcription factor 2 is critically involved in this process along with a large number of nuclear coregulators. Wnt signaling has been recently identified as a critical pathway involved in the regulation of osteoblastogenesis. The impairment of osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells occurs in multiple myeloma due to the capacity of malignant plasma cells to suppress the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells either through the cell contact or the release of soluble factors as interleukin-7, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-3, and Wnt inhibitors.

Conclusion

Runt-related transcription factor 2 and Wnt pathways could be therapeutic targets in the treatment of multiple myeloma bone disease to counterbalance the block of osteogenic differentiation induced by multiple myeloma cells.

Article Outline

Abstract

Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

Role of the transcription factor Runx2

Wnt signaling

Mechanisms involved in suppression of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells by MM cells

Effect ofMM cells onRunx2 activity in osteoprogenitor cells

Role of IL-3 in the inhibition of osteoblasts formation by MM cells

Role of Wnt inhibitors and Wnt signaling in MM-induced osteoblast suppression

Ubiquitin-proteasome andPTH pathways: potential therapeutic targets for bone regeneration inMM

Proteasome inhibitors

PTH

Conclusions

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by its high capacity to induce osteolytic bone lesions [1]. MM patients with bone lesions have uncoupled or severely imbalanced bone remodeling in which bone resorption and formation are no longer balanced, but instead bone resorption is markedly increased and bone formation is either decreased or absent. In contrast, MM patients without bone lesions display balanced bone remodeling with increased osteoclastogenesis and normal or increased bone formation rates [2]. Clinical studies have shown that MM patients with advanced bone lesions may have a reduction of bone formation markers, such as alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, together with increased bone resorption markers [3]. Similarly, marked osteoblastopenia and reduced bone formation have been also reported in murine models of MM bone disease [4]. These data suggest that MM cells suppress osteoblast formation and differentiation and thereby inhibit bone formation. Increased knowledge of the signaling pathways involved in the regulation of osteoblast formation and differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells have provided a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in MM-induced osteoblast inhibition and permitted identification of several potential therapeutics targets for the treatment of MM bone disease.

Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells 

return to Article Outline

Role of the transcription factor Runx2 

Under physiological conditions, the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells is tightly regulated either by system hormones, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), estrogens, and glucocorticoids or by local growth factors, including the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family, transforming growth factor–β, and fibroblast growth factor 2 [5]. Moreover, these factors activate specific intracellular signal pathways that modify the expression and activity of several transcription factors in mesenchymal and osteoprogenitor cells, which result in osteoblastic differentiation 5, 6.

In the last several years, most of these transcription factors have been identified. Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), also named Cbfa1 or AML3, is the major transcription factor regulating osteoblast commitment and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells 6, 7, 8. Studies in mice lacking Runx2 indicated that the expression of Runx2 is critical for mesenchymal cell differentiation toward the osteoblast lineage. Runx2-deficient mice (Runx2/) completely lack osteoblasts and bone formation, demonstrating a pivotal role for this factor in osteoblastogenesis 6, 7, 8. However, Runx2 overexpression also impairs bone formation in mice [9], indicating that, depending on the stage of osteoblast differentiation, Runx2 could have different effects on the bone formation process. Runx2-overexpressing mice also show enhanced bone resorption, possibly through increased expression of the osteoclast stimulating factor receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand by osteoprogenitor cells [10]. Human osteoblast differentiation is primarily associated with increased Runx2 activity without changes in messenger RNA or protein expression 11, 12. Activation of Runx2 in human bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal cells induces expression of the osteoblast-related markers collagen I, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin during the early stages of the osteoblast maturation [11].

Both expression and activity of Runx2 are tightly regulated by other transcription factors as well as proteinDNA or proteinprotein interactions. Runx2 itself is regulated by phosphorylation by the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway [13]. Hey-1, Hoxa2, Stat1, and Sox9 interact with Runx2 and inhibit its expression and/or transcriptional activity and thus are negative regulators of osteoblast differentiation. Runx2 activity is also positively regulated by transcription factors such as TAZ, Hoxa10, or BAPX-1 5, 6, 8. In addition, multiple signaling pathways converge to interact with Runx2 to regulate osteoblast differentiation, including binding with activator protein 1 and activating transcription factor 4 that with Runx2 regulate osteocalcin and Osterix (Osx) 5, 6, 8. Because Osx is a zinc finger transcription factor that is important for osteoblast differentiation. Osx-deficient mice lack osteoblast formation. Osx acts as a downstream of Runx2 5, 6. In mouse systems, osteogenic factors stimulate osteogenesis through regulation of these transcription factors. BMP-2 promotes Runx2 and Osx expression in murine osteoprogenitor and osteoblastic cells, and transforming growth factor–β and fibroblast growth factor 2 may enhance osteoblast differentiation by increasing Runx2 expression and activity 5, 6.

Wnt signaling 

Several studies have demonstrated that Wnt signaling plays a critical role in the regulation of osteoblast formation 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Canonical Wnt signaling pathway is activated by Wnt 1/3a that triggers the phosphorylation of GSK3/Axin complex, leading to the stabilization and nuclear translocation of the active dephosphorylated (dephospho) β-catenin, which in turn activates the lymphoid enhancer factor-1/T-cell factor transcription system 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. In murine systems activation of canonical Wnt signaling in osteoblast progenitors induces osteogenic differentiation 17, 18. In particular, BMP-2 and other osteogenic molecules induce osteoblastic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells by stimulating Wnt signaling through modulation of Wnt stimulators and/or inhibitors [18]. Several molecules negatively regulate canonical Wnt signaling by inducing phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of β-catenin inhibiting osteoblast differentiation in murine osteoprogenitor cells. Dickkopfs (DKKs), including DKK-1 [19], the secreted frizzled related proteins (sFRPs), such as sFRP-1, -2, -3, -4, and Wnt inhibitory factor-1 are the major soluble Wnt inhibitors present in murine osteoblasts, which block early osteoblast formation and induce the death of immature cells 20, 21. The mechanism by which these inhibitors block the canonical Wnt signal pathway is different. sFRP family are able to bind Wnt soluble agonists or the frizzled (FZ) family of the Wnt receptor, whereas DKKs prevent the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway by binding to LRP5/6 and Kremen abolishing Wnt/LRP6 signaling 20, 21, 22.

In vivo models support the role of canonical Wnt signaling in the regulation of bone formation 23, 24, 25. Inactivating mutations of the LRP5 Wnt coreceptor cause osteoporosis [23], indicating that Wnt-mediated signaling via LRP5 affects bone accrual during growth and is important for the establishment of peak bone mass. Constitutive activating LRP5 mutations impair the action of normal antagonists of the Wnt pathway such as DKK-1 and increase Wnt signaling, which result in high bone density 24, 25. In addition a targeted destruction of LRP5 in mice induce a low bone mass phenotype due to a decrease of osteoblast proliferation and function independently to Runx2 as demonstrated by a normal Runx2 expression in Lrp5/ mice [26]. On the other hand, it has been reported that canonical Wnt signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression [27]. In sFRP-1 null mice, which exhibits activated Wnt signaling and high bone mass phenotype, there is a significant increase of both T-cell factor and Runx2 expression [27]. Similarly, overexpression of Wnt10b in mice protect from bone loss of estrogen deficiency and shifts mesenchymal stem cells toward osteoblastic lineage by induction of Runx2 [28]. All these results demonstrate that canonical Wnt signaling plays an important role in bone formation both independently and dependent to Runx2 expression.

Despite the consistent findings between human genetic studies and mouse studies, which indicate that activation of canonical Wnt signaling stimulate bone formation, recent in vitro data obtained with human mesenchymal cells indicate that canonical Wnt activation by Wnt3a in human BM mesenchymal cells suppresses osteogenic differentiation rather than stimulates osteoblastogenesis as observed in murine osteoprogenitor cells 29, 30, 31, 32. These results suggest that Wnt signaling is required to maintain human mesenchymal cells in an undifferentiated state. We can suppose that the effect of canonical Wnt signaling on osteogenesis in human mesenchymal may depend to the level of Wnt activity given that hyperactivation of Wnt signaling by overexpressing LRP5 [24] can enhance osteogenesis, whereas exogenous levels of Wnt3a inhibit osteoblast differentiation 29, 30. Alternatively, the effect of canonical Wnt signaling may depend on the stage of differentiation of the cells. Accordingly, it has been reported that canonical Wnt signaling antagonizes the terminal steps of osteogenic differentiation as demonstrated by the evidence that mice lacking the Wnt inhibitor DKK-2 are osteopenic [33]. Consistently an increased expression of Wnt antagonists during late osteoblast differentiation has been shown 34, 35. Finally, we could suppose a different behavior between murine and human osteoprogenitor cells.

Together with canonical Wnt signaling, a noncanonical Wnt pathway independent to the activation of β-catenin has been extensively demonstrated (reviewed in 14, 16, 36, 37). Noncanonical Wnt signals are transduced through FZD receptor and Ror2 coreceptor to several cascades involving disheveled or Ca++ dependent pathways. Rho family small GTPase (RhoA, Rac) and JNK are downstream effectors of disheveled. Nemo-like kinase and the nuclear factor of activated T cells are Ca++ effectors of noncanonical pathways 36, 37. Wnt-4, -5, and-11 proteins have been identified as specific activator of noncanonical Wnt pathway 14, 16, 36, 37. Recent evidences suggest that noncanonical Wnt pathway activation by Wnt5a blunted the inhibitory effect of Wnt3a on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal cells and stimulate osteoblast differentiation 38, 39. Similarly, noncanonical Wnt-4 signaling enhances bone regeneration of mesenchymal stem cells in vivo [38]. The pro-osteogenic effect of Wnt5a could be mediated by activation and homodimerization of the Ror2 receptor in mesenchymal cells, whereas Wnt3a has not effect on Ror2 activation and homodimerization 39, 40. It has been consistently shown that Ror2 overexpression in human mesenchymal stem cells induces expression of the osteogenic transcription factors Osx and Runx2 and induces osteogenic differentiation 40, 41, 42. Finally, it has been recently demonstrated that noncanonical Wnt pathway through Nemo-like kinase represses peroxisome proliferation activated receptor–γ transactivation and induces Runx2 expression promoting osteoblastogenesis in BM mesenchymal stem cells suggesting a potential relationship between noncanonical pathway and Runx2 activity [43].

All these evidences suggest that the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway is involved in mesenchymal cells osteogenic differentiation.

Mechanisms involved in suppression of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells by MM cells 

return to Article Outline

Effect ofMM cells onRunx2 activity in osteoprogenitor cells 

Impairment of osteoblast and bone formation in MM is mainly due to the block of the osteogenic differentiation process of mesenchymal cells induced by MM cells. Coculture of human MM cells with osteoprogenitor cells inhibited osteoblast differentiation in long-term BM cultures. MM cells reduced early osteoblast precursors, fibroblast colony-forming units (CFU-F), and the more differentiated osteoblast precursor, the colony-forming osteoblast units (CFU-OB), as well as expression of osteoblastic differentiation markers, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and collagen I [44]. These in vitro observations have been confirmed in vivo in MM patients [45], although this is controversial 46, 47.

The inhibitory effect of MM cells on osteoblast differentiation appears to be mediated by the capacity of MM cells to inhibit Runx2 activity in human mesenchymal stem and osteoprogenitor cells [44]. It has been consistently reported that the number of mesenchymal and osteoblastic Runx2-positive cells, were lower in patients with osteolytic lesions as compared to patients without skeletal involvement [44]. Suppression of Runx2 activity by MM cells is mediated, at least in part, by the cell-to-cell contact between MM and osteoprogenitor cells. This cell-to-cell contact involves interactions between very late antigen 4 (VLA-4) on MM cells and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) on osteoblast progenitors, as demonstrated by the capacity of a neutralizing antiVLA-4 antibody to reduce the inhibitory effects of MM cells on Runx2/Cbfa1 activity [44]. The role of cell-to-cell contact via VLA-4/VCAM-1 interaction in the development of bone lesions by osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition in MM has been recently demonstrated using in vivo mouse models [48]. When the human MM cell line, JJN3, which strongly expresses VLA-4, is implanted in irradiated severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, the mice developed lytic lesions and marked osteoblastopenia with a significant reduction of bone formation [4]. In addition to VLA-4/VCAM-1, other adhesion molecules appear to be involved in the inhibition of osteoblastogenesis by human MM cells. For example, neural cell adhesion molecule to neural cell adhesion molecule interactions between MM cells and stromal/osteoblastic cells decrease bone matrix production by osteoblastic cells, and may contribute to development of bone lesions in MM patients [49]. Soluble factors contribute to the inhibitory effects of MM cells on osteoblast differentiation by mesenchymal stem cells and Runx2/Cbfa1 activity [44]. Interleukin-7 (IL-7) decreases Runx2/Cbfa1 promoter activity and the expression of osteoblast markers in osteoblastic cells [43]. Moreover, IL-7 can inhibit bone formation in vivo in mice [50], as well as CFU-F and CFU-OB formation in human BM cultures and reduces Runx2 activity in human osteoprogenitor cells [44]. The potential involvement of IL-7 in MM has been supported by the demonstration of higher IL-7 plasma levels in MM patients compared to normal subjects [51] and by the capacity of blocking antibodies to IL-7 to partially blunt the inhibitory effects of MM cells on osteoblast differentiation [44]. These studies suggest that MM cells block Runx2 activity and osteoblast differentiation either by cell-to-cell contact or by secreting IL-7, which leads to a reduction in the number of more differentiated osteoblastic cells. Other soluble factors may also be involved in this process. The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is produced by MM cells and its high levels in BM of MM correlated with those of alkaline phosphatase [52]. HGF inhibits in vitro osteoblastogenesis induced by BMP-2 and BMP-induced expression of alkaline phosphatase in both human and murine mesenchymal cells. Moreover, HGF treatment reduced the expression of transcription factors Runx2 and Osx as well as Smad [52].

TAZ, a Runx2/Cbfa1 transcriptional coactivator, has been recently shown to modulate the osteogenic potential of the human mesenchymal stem cells 8, 53. TAZ expression is lower in MM patients as compared to healthy donors [54]. The repressed osteogenesis and TAZ expression were both partially restored by neutralization of tumor necrosis factor–α [54].

The inhibition of Runx2 in BM osteoprogenitor cells by MM cells through the previously mentioned mechanisms suggest that Runx2 could be a target to counterbalance the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation in MM. Modulation of Runx2 activity has been shown with anabolic agents, such as PTH amino-terminal peptide 134 55, 56. Moreover, in vivo mouse models have shown that Runx2 gene transfer enhances osteogenic activity of BM mesenchymal cells [57]. Clearly, further studies will be necessary to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in MM.

Role of IL-3 in the inhibition of osteoblasts formation by MM cells 

Interleukin-3 (IL-3) has been reported as a potential osteoblast inhibitor in MM patients [58]. In both murine and human system, IL-3 indirectly inhibited osteoblast formation in a dose-dependent manner, without affecting cell growth at concentrations comparable to those seen in BM plasma from patients with MM. IL-3 levels in BM plasma from patients with MM were increased in approximately 70% of patients compared to normal controls or patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients [59]. IL-3 is also produced by T lymphocytes in the MM bone microenvironment [60]. Importantly, BM plasma from patients with MM with high levels of IL-3 inhibited osteoblast formation in human cultures, and this inhibition was partially reversed by addition of a neutralizing antibody to human IL-3 [58]. The inhibitory effect of IL-3 was increased in the presence of tumor necrosis factor–α, a cytokine induced in the MM marrow microenvironment. The effect of IL-3 is indirect and mediated by CD45+/CD11b+ monocyte/macrophages in both human and mouse primary culture systems. IL-3 increased the number of CD45+ hematopoietic cells in stromal cell cultures, and depletion of the CD45+ cells abolished the inhibitory effects of IL-3 on osteoblasts. Importantly, reconstituted CD45+ depleted cultures with CD45+ cells, restored the capacity of IL-3 to inhibit osteoblast differentiation. On the other hand, IL-3 had no direct effect on osteoblast progenitors or on Runx2 expression and activity in both murine and human BM cells [58].

Role of Wnt inhibitors and Wnt signaling in MM-induced osteoblast suppression 

The potential involvement of inhibitors of Wnt signaling in the suppression of osteoblast formation and function in MM has been investigated. Primary CD138+MM cells overexpress the Wnt inhibitors DKK-1 as compared to plasma cells from MGUS patients and normal plasma cells [61]. Further, using gene expression profiling, a tight correlation between DKK-1 expression by MM cells and the occurrence of focal lytic bone lesions in MM patients has been reported. High DKK-1 levels in BM and peripheral sera in MM patients correlated with the presence of bone lesions [62]. Interestingly, patients with advanced disease, as well as human MM cell lines did not express DKK-1 61, 62, suggesting that DKK-1 may mediate bone destruction in the early phases of disease. MM cells also produce other Wnt inhibitors, including sFRP-3/FRZB. FRZB is highly expressed by CD138+MM cells from patients as compared to MGUS patients, and BM plasma levels are higher in MM patients with bone lesions as compared to those without skeletal involvement [62]. sFRP-2 has been also reported to be produced by some human MM cell lines and by patients with advanced MM bone disease, and can inhibit osteoblast differentiation [63].

The mechanism by which DKK-1 and the other Wnt inhibitors produced by MM cells is related to bone destruction is not completely understood. Neutralizing antiDKK-1 antibody can block the inhibitory effect of BM plasma of MM patients on BMP-2induced alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast formation by a murine mesenchymal cell line [61], but failed to block the inhibitory effects of MM cells on human BM osteoblast formation [44]. In addition, only high concentrations of DKK-1 are able to inhibit CFU-F and CFU-OB formation and to block β-catenin signaling in human BM osteoprogenitor cells [44]. Recently, we reported that MM cells failed to block canonical Wnt signaling in human BM osteoblast progenitors but inhibited this pathway in murine systems suggesting that blockade of the canonical Wnt pathway does not occur in MM patients [62].

Other mechanisms could be involved in DDK-1mediated bone destruction in MM. For example, a link between cell adhesion and the Wnt pathway was recently reported. Wnt inhibitors, such as DKK-1, are triggered by cell contact and modulate adhesion of leukemia cells to osteoblasts [64]. Possibly, DKK-1 production by MM cells could be involved in the adhesion of stromal and MM cells, which is critical for osteoclast activation and MM-induced Runx2 inhibition and osteoblast suppression. Further, crosstalk between MM cells and the microenvironment can stimulate both DKK-1 and IL-6 production in human BM cultures [65]. The capacity of DKK-1 to regulate expression of the osteoclast inhibitory factor, OPG, has been also reported in murine osteoblasts [66].

Studies in the SCID-human mice model of MM have shown that antiDKK-1 increases bone mineral density and the number of osteocalcin positive osteoblasts compared to control mice [67]. Interestingly, a reduction of the number of osteoclastic cells was also observed, suggesting that Wnt signaling could be involved in the regulation of bone resorption [67]. Consistently, it has been reported that activation of the Wnt3a signaling pathway in the bone microenvironment is able to block the development of bone lesions and the growth of MM cells in murine MM models 68, 69. These observations are in line with those showing that canonical Wnt pathway stimulates bone formation in mice. Interestingly, both an antiDKK-1 antibody and Wnt canonical activation by Wnt3a or by litium 68, 69 are able to blunt the inhibitory effect of MM cells on osteoblast formation independently of the production of DKK-1 by MM cells. These results suggest that the bone microenvironment rather than MM cells is the target of antiDKK-1 antibody therapy.

Ubiquitin-proteasome andPTH pathways: potential therapeutic targets for bone regeneration inMM 

return to Article Outline

Proteasome inhibitors 

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the major cellular degradative system for several proteins involved in cell proliferation and survival in MM cells. Recently, it has been demonstrated that this pathway may regulate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation in vitro and in vivo in mice [70]. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway can modulate the expression of BMP-2, which can induce osteoblast differentiation through Wnt signaling and regulates the proteolytic degradation of the osteoblast transcription factor Runx2/Cbfa1 [71]. Different proteasome inhibitors that bind the catalytic β subunits of the 20S proteasome and block its activity are able to stimulate bone formation in neonatal murine calvarial bones [70]. A strong correlation between the capacity of these compounds to inhibit proteasomal activity in osteoblasts and their bone forming activity was also demonstrated [70]. Consistent with these in vitro observations, the administration of the natural proteasome inhibitors PS1 and epoximicin to mice, increased bone volume and bone formation rate >70% after 5 days, indicating a potent stimulatory effect of these drugs on osteoblastic cells [70]. These results are strongly supported by the in vivo observations obtained in MM patients treated with the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib. Increases of total alkaline phosphatase and the isoenzyme, bone specific alkaline phosphatase, have been reported in MM patients that respond to treatment with bortezomib 72, 73, 74. Others have reported a significant increase in bone remodeling markers in all patients treated with bortezomib 75, 76. Recent data indicate that bortezomib at low concentration (24nM) induces osteoblast differentiation from human mesenchymal cells in vitro and increases Runx2 activity without stabilization of β-catenin [77]. This results in the expression of osteoblast markers such as collagen I and osteocalcin and in the increase of bone nodule formation by human osteoprogenitor cells [77]. A similar effect was observed using specific proteasome inhibitors, e.g., as MG-132 and MG-262, indicating that the pro-osteogenic effect of bortezomib is due to its capacity to block proteasome activity in osteoblasts and osteoblast progenitors [77]. In line with these observations, bortezomib stimulate bone regeneration in mice in part by the modulation of the bone-specific transcription factor Runx2 and is able to rescue bone loss in a mouse model of osteoporosis [78].

Recently, the capacity of bortezomib at low concentration to stimulate osteoblastogenesis has been clearly confirmed in several osteoprogenitor cell lines both in murine and human system [79], suggesting the potential role of this drug as anabolic agent in MM patients. The authors reported that bortezomib activates β-catenin at high concentration (50-500nM) in human mesenchymal cells; even if the pro-osteogenic effect of Bortezomib occurs at low concentration 77, 78, 79.

PTH 

PTH amino-terminal peptide 134 has been shown to stimulate bone formation in mice and rats [56]. Moreover, clinical trials with intermittent PTH administration increases bone mass and reduce the incidence of fracture in patients with postmenopausal or glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis [80]. Several mechanisms are involved in the anabolic effect of PTH. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that PTH directly activates survival signaling in osteoblasts, and that delay of osteoblast apoptosis is the major contributor to the increased osteoblast number, at least in mice [56]. This effect requires Runx2-dependent expression of antiapoptotic genes like Bcl-2 55, 81. PTH promote osteoblast differentiation by its ability to promote exit from the cell cycle by decreasing expression of cyclin D and increasing expression of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors 56, 82. PTH it has been shown to activate Wnt signaling in osteoblasts, to inhibit the Wnt antagonist sclerostin in osteocytes and to increase the Notch ligand Jagged1 in osteoblasts 82, 83. Interestingly, increasing evidence indicate that osteoblast expansion by PTH as well as PTH-mediated signal pathway in osteoblasts may stimulate and increase the number of hemopoietic stem cells 84, 85. Possible mechanisms involved in PTH stimulation of the osteoblastic niches include alterations in the expression of hematopoietic cytokines such as the stem cell factor, Notch ligands and insulin growth factor-1/2 [86].

On the basis of all these results, PTH could be used in the future as potential anabolic agent in MM to increase bone formation. Preliminary data obtained in SCID-rabbit MM model indicate that PTH administration, similarly to bortezomib, significantly increased BMD resulting in slower growth of MM cells [87]. In turn, it has recently been shown that the in vivo anabolic effect of bortezomib can be associated to an intermittent elevation of PTH levels in MM patients [88].

Conclusions 

return to Article Outline

Multiple factors are involved in the interactions between MM cells and osteoprogenitor cells in the development of osteolytic bone lesions and the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. Blockade of Runx2 activity and soluble factors such as IL-3, IL-7, and HGF have recently been identified as osteoblast inhibitors in MM. Many studies have reported that the production of canonical Wnt antagonists such as DKK-1, sFRP-2, and sFRP-3 by MM cells correlates with the presence of osteolytic bone lesions in MM and that stimulatory Wnt signaling in the bone microenvironment could be a potential therapy in MM bone disease (Fig. 1). However, further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms by which the production of Wnt antagonists by MM cells are involved in suppression of osteoblast differentiation by human mesenchymal stem cells.


View full-size image.

Figure 1  Several mechanisms are potentially involved in multiple myeloma (MM)induced inhibition of osteoblast formation and differentiation. MM cells inhibit osteoblastogenesis by blocking Runx2 activity in mesenchymal and osteoprogenitor cells through direct cell-to-cell contact with the involvement of very late antigen 4 (VLA-4)/vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Soluble factors as interleukin (IL)-7 may contribute to the suppression of Runx2 activity by MM cells. Direct production of the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), secreted frizzled related protein (sFRP)-3, and rarely sFRP-2 by MM cells as well as the overproduction of hepatocyte growth factor could inhibit osteoblast formation. Finally, IL-3 overproduction in the MM microenvironment is involved in the inhibition of osteoblast formation and differentiation.


Emerging data indicate that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway may regulate osteoblast formation and differentiation, and that proteasome inhibitors as bortezomib may stimulate bone formation and regeneration and have potential therapeutical implications for MM bone disease.

Acknowledgments 

return to Article Outline

This article was supported by an International Myeloma Foundation (IMF) grant (North Hollywood, CA, USA) and by a grant of the “Regione Emilia Romagna-Ministero della salute” (Parma, Italy). We thank Prof. G.D. Roodman for the revision of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

No financial interest/relationships with financial interest relating to the topic of this article have been declared.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1860–1873. CrossRef

2. 2Giuliani N, Rizzoli V. GD Roodman. Multiple myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology of osteoblast inhibition. Blood. 2006;108:3992–3996. MEDLINE | CrossRef

3. 3Vejlgaard T, Abildgaard N, Jans H, et al. Abnormal bone turnover in monoclonal gammaopathy of undetermined significance: analyses of type I collagen telopeptide, osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and propeptides of type I and type III. procollagens. Eur J Haematol. 1997;58:104–108.

4. 4Hjorth-Hansen H, Seifert MF, Borset M, et al. Marked osteoblastopenia and reduced bone formation in a model of multiple myeloma bone disease in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:256–263. MEDLINE | CrossRef

5. 5Franceschi RT, Ge C, Xiao G, et al. Transcriptional regulation of osteoblasts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1116:196–207. CrossRef

6. 6Deng ZL, Sharff KA, Tang N, et al. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation during skeletal development. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2001–2021. CrossRef

7. 7Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, et al. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997;89:747–754. MEDLINE | CrossRef

8. 8Franceschi RT, Xiao G. Regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor, Runx2: responsiveness to multiple signal transduction pathways. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88:446–454. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9Liu W, Toyosawa S, Furuichi T, et al. Overexpression of Cbfa1 in osteoblasts inhibits osteoblast maturation and causes osteopenia with multiple fractures. J Cell Biol. 2001;155:157–166. MEDLINE | CrossRef

10. 10Geoffroy V, Kneissel M, Fournier B, et al. High bone resorption in adult aging transgenic mice overexpressing cbfa1/runx2 in cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:6222–6233. MEDLINE | CrossRef

11. 11Shui C, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL, Khosla S. Changes in Runx2/Cbfa1 expression and activity during osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:213–221. MEDLINE | CrossRef

12. 12Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Hay SJ, et al. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1827–1835. MEDLINE | CrossRef

13. 13Xiao G, Jiang D, Thomas P, et al. MAPK pathways activate and phosphorylate the osteoblast-specific transcription factor. Cbfa1. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4453–4459.

14. 14Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene. 2004;341:19–39. MEDLINE | CrossRef

15. 15Krishnan V, Bryant HU, Macdougald OA. Regulation of bone mass by Wnt signaling. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1202–1209. MEDLINE | CrossRef

16. 16Gordon MD, Nusse R. Wnt signaling: multiple pathways, multiple receptors, and multiple transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:22429–22433. MEDLINE | CrossRef

17. 17Bennett CN, Longo KA, Wright WS, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3324–3329. MEDLINE | CrossRef

18. 18Rawadi G, Vayssiere B, Dunn F, et al. BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1842–1853. MEDLINE | CrossRef

19. 19Niida A, Hiroko T, Kasai M, et al. DKK1, a negative regulator of Wnt signaling, is a target of the beta-catenin/TCF pathway. Oncogene. 2004;23:8520–8526. MEDLINE | CrossRef

20. 20Galli LM, Barnes T, Cheng T, et al. Differential inhibition of Wnt-3a by Sfrp-1, Sfrp-2, and Sfrp-3. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:681–690. MEDLINE | CrossRef

21. 21Li J, Sarosi I, Cattley RC, et al. Dkk1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling in bone results in osteopenia. Bone. 2006;39:754–766. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (2105 KB) | CrossRef

22. 22Kawano Y, Kypta R. Secreted antagonists of the Wnt signalling pathway. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2627–2634. MEDLINE | CrossRef

23. 23Boyden LM, Mao J, Belsky J, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1513–1521. CrossRef

24. 24Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. MEDLINE | CrossRef

25. 25Ai M, Holmen SL, Van Hul W, et al. Reduced affinity to and inhibition by DKK1 form a common mechanism by which high bone mass-associated missense mutations in LRP5 affect canonical Wnt signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:4946–4955. MEDLINE | CrossRef

26. 26Kato M, Patel MS, Levasseur R, et al. Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:303–314. MEDLINE | CrossRef

27. 27Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33132–33140. MEDLINE | CrossRef

28. 28Bennett CN, Longo KA, Wright WS, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3324–3329. MEDLINE | CrossRef

29. 29de Boer J, Siddappa R, Gaspar C, et al. Wnt signaling inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone. 2004;34:818–826. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (319 KB) | CrossRef

30. 30Boland GM, Perkins G, Hall DJ, et al. Wnt 3a promotes proliferation and suppresses osteogenic differentiation of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2004;93:1210–1230. MEDLINE | CrossRef

31. 31Baksh D, Boland GM, Tuan RS. Cross-talk between Wnt signaling pathways in human mesenchymal stem cells leads to functional antagonism during osteogenic differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101:1109–1124. CrossRef

32. 32Baksh D, Tuan RS. Canonical and non-canonical wnts differentially affect the development potential of primary isolate of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007;212:817–826. MEDLINE | CrossRef

33. 33Li X, Liu P, Liu W, et al. Dkk2 has a role in terminal osteoblast differentiation and mineralized matrix formation. Nat Genet. 2005;37:945–952. MEDLINE | CrossRef

34. 34van der Horst G, van der Werf SM, Farih-Sips H, et al. Downregulation of Wnt signaling by increased expression of Dickkopf-1 and -2 is a prerequisite for late-stage osteoblast differentiation of KS483 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1867–1877.

35. 35Vaes BL, Dechering KJ, van Someren EP, et al. Microarray analysis reveals expression regulation of Wnt antagonists in differentiating osteoblasts. Bone. 2005;36:803–811. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (7033 KB) | CrossRef

36. 36Ling L, Nurcombe V, Cool SM. Wnt signaling controls the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene. 2009;433:1–7. CrossRef

37. 37Katoh M, Katoh M. WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4042–4045. CrossRef

38. 38Chang J, Sonoyama W, Wang Z, et al. Noncanonical Wnt-4 signaling enhances bone regeneration of mesenchymal stem cells in craniofacial defects through activation of p38 MAPK. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30938–30948. CrossRef

39. 39Liu Y, Rubin B, Bodine PV, et al. Wnt5a induces homodimerization and activation of Ror2 receptor tyrosine kinase. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105:497–502. CrossRef

40. 40Liu Y, Ross JF, Bodine PV, et al. Homodimerization of Ror2 tyrosine kinase receptor induces 14-3-3(beta) phosphorylation and promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:3050–3061. CrossRef

41. 41Liu Y, Bhat RA, Seestaller-Wehr LM, et al. The orphan receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 promotes osteoblast differentiation and enhances ex vivo bone formation. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:376–387. MEDLINE | CrossRef

42. 42Billiard J, Way DS, Seestaller-Wehr LM, et al. The orphan receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 modulates canonical Wnt signaling in osteoblastic cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19:90–101. MEDLINE | CrossRef

43. 43Takada I, Mihara M, Suzawa M, et al. A histone lysine methyltransferase activated by non-canonical Wnt signalling suppresses PPAR-gamma transactivation. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:1273–1285. CrossRef

44. 44Giuliani N, Colla S, Morandi F, et al. myeloma cells block RUNX2/CBFA1 activity in human bone marrow osteoblast progenitors and inhibit osteoblast formation and differentiation. Blood. 2005;106:2472–2483. MEDLINE | CrossRef

45. 45Corre J, Mahtouk K, Attal M, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are abnormal in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21:1079–1088. MEDLINE

46. 46Garderet L, Mazurier C, Chapel A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:2032–2041. CrossRef

47. 47Arnulf B, Lecourt S, Soulier J, et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21:158–163. MEDLINE | CrossRef

48. 48Mori Y, Shimizu N, Dallas M, et al. Anti-alpha4 integrin antibody suppresses the development of multiple myeloma and associated osteoclastic osteolysis. Blood. 2004;104:2149–2154. MEDLINE | CrossRef

49. 49Ely SA, Knowles DM. Expression of CD56/neural cell adhesion molecule correlates with the presence of lytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma and distinguishes myeloma from monoclonal gamyelomaopathy of undetermined significance and lymphomas with plasmacytoid differentiation. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:1293–1299. MEDLINE

50. 50Weitzmann MN, Roggia C, Toraldo G, et al. Increased production of IL-7 uncouples bone formation from bone resorption during estrogen deficiency. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1643–1650. MEDLINE | CrossRef

51. 51Giuliani N, Colla S, Sala R, et al. Human myeloma cells stimulate the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) in T lymphocytes: a potential role in multiple myeloma bone disease. Blood. 2002;100:4615–4621. MEDLINE | CrossRef

52. 52Standal T, Abildgaard N, Fagerli UM, et al. HGF inhibits BMP-induced osteoblastogenesis: possible implications for the bone disease of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2007;109:3024–3030. MEDLINE

53. 53Hong JH, Hwang ES, McManus MT, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309:1074–1078. CrossRef

54. 54Li B, Shi M, Li J, et al. Elevated tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppresses TAZ expression and impairs osteogenic potential of Flk-1+ mesenchymal stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:921–930. CrossRef

55. 55Krishnan V, Moore TL, Ma YL, et al. Parathyroid hormone bone anabolic action requires Cbfa1/Runx2-dependent signaling. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17:423–435. MEDLINE | CrossRef

56. 56Jilka RL. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the anabolic effect of intermittent PTH. Bone. 2007;40:1434–1446. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (338 KB) | CrossRef

57. 57Zhao Z, Zhao M, Xiao G, et al. Gene transfer of the Runx2 transcription factor enhances osteogenic activity of bone marrow stromal cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther. 2005;12:247–253. MEDLINE | CrossRef

58. 58Ehrlich LA, Chung HY, Ghobrial I, et al. IL-3 is a potential inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005;106:1407–1414. MEDLINE | CrossRef

59. 59Lee JW, Chung HY, Ehrlich LA, et al. IL-3 expression by myeloma cells increases both osteoclast formation and growth of myeloma cells. Blood. 2004;103:2308–2315. MEDLINE | CrossRef

60. 60Giuliani N, Morandi F, Tagliaferri S, et al. Interleukin-3 (IL-3) is overexpressed by T lymphocytes in multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2006;107:841–842. MEDLINE | CrossRef

61. 61Tian E, Zhan F, Walker R, et al. The role of the Wnt-signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2483–2494. CrossRef

62. 62Giuliani N, Morandi F, Tagliaferri S, et al. Production of wnt inhibitors by myeloma cells: potential effects on canonical wnt pathway in the bone microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7665–7674. CrossRef

63. 63Oshima T, Abe M, Asano J, et al. Myeloma cells suppress bone formation by secreting a soluble Wnt inhibitor, sFRP-2. Blood. 2005;106:3160–3165. MEDLINE | CrossRef

64. 64De Toni F, Racaud-Sultan C, Chicanne G, et al. A crosstalk between the Wnt and the adhesion-dependent signaling pathways governs the chemosensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene. 2006;25:3113–3122. MEDLINE | CrossRef

65. 65Gunn WG, Conley A, Deininger L, et al. A crosstalk between myeloma cells and marrow stromal cells stimulates production of DKK1 and interleukin-6: a potential role in the development of lytic bone disease and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells. 2006;24:986–991. MEDLINE | CrossRef

66. 66Qiang YW, Chen Y, Stephens O, et al. Myeloma-derived Dickkopf-1 disrupts Wnt-regulated osteoprotegerin and RANKL production by osteoblasts: a potential mechanism underlying osteolytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;112:196–207. CrossRef

67. 67Yaccoby S, Ling W, Zhan F, et al. Antibody-based inhibition of DKK1 suppresses tumor- induced bone resorption and multiple myeloma growth in- vivo. Blood. 2007;109:2106–2111. MEDLINE | CrossRef

68. 68Qiang YW, Shaughnessy JD, Yaccoby S. Wnt3a signaling within bone inhibits multiple myeloma bone disease and tumor growth. Blood. 2008;112:374–382. CrossRef

69. 69Edwards CM, Edwards JR, Lwin ST, et al. Mundy GR. Increasing Wnt signaling in the bone marrow microenvironment inhibits the development of myeloma bone disease and reduces tumor burden in bone in vivo. Blood. 2008;111:2833–2842. CrossRef

70. 70Garrett IR, Chen D, Gutierrez G, et al. Selective inhibitors of the osteoblast proteasome stimulate bone formation in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1771–1782. MEDLINE | CrossRef

71. 71Zhao M, Qiao M, Oyajobi BO, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 mediates core-binding factor alpha1/Runx2 degradation and plays a specific role in osteoblast differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27939–27944. MEDLINE | CrossRef

72. 72Zangari M, Esseltine D, Lee CK, et al. Response to bortezomib is associated to osteoblastic activation in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005;131:71–73. MEDLINE | CrossRef

73. 73Zangari M, Yaccoby S, Cavallo F, et al. Response to bortezomib and activation of osteoblasts in multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2006;7:109–114. MEDLINE | CrossRef

74. 74Shimazaki C, Uchida R, Nakano S, et al. High serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase level after bortezomib-combined therapy in refractory multiple myeloma: possible role of bortezomib on osteoblast differentiation. Leukemia. 2005;19:1102–1103. MEDLINE | CrossRef

75. 75Heider U, Kaiser M, Muller C, et al. Bortezomib increases osteoblast activity in myeloma patients irrespective of response to treatment. Eur J Haematol. 2006;77:233–238. MEDLINE | CrossRef

76. 76Terpos E, Heath DJ, Rahemtulla A, et al. Bortezomib reduces serum dickkopf-1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand concentrations and normalises indices of bone remodeling in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2006;135:688–692. MEDLINE | CrossRef

77. 77Giuliani N, Morandi F, Tagliaferri S, et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib affects osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo in multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2007;110:334–338. MEDLINE | CrossRef

78. 78Mukherjee S, Raje N, Schoonmaker JA, et al. Pharmacologic targeting of a stem/progenitor population in vivo is associated with enhanced bone regeneration in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:491–504.

79. 79Qiang YW, Hu B, Chen Y, et al. Bortezomib induces osteoblast differentiation via Wnt-independent activation of {beta}-catenin/TCF signaling. Blood. 2009;113:4319–4330. CrossRef

80. 80Girotra M, Rubin MR, Bilezikian JP. The use of parathyroid hormone in the treatment of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7:113–121. MEDLINE | CrossRef

81. 81Bellido T, Ali AA, Plotkin LI, et al. Proteasomal degradation of Runx2 shortens parathyroid hormone-induced anti-apoptotic signaling in osteoblasts. A putative explanation for why intermittent administration is needed for bone anabolism. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:50259–50272. MEDLINE | CrossRef

82. 82Kousteni S, Bilezikian JP. The cell biology of parathyroid hormone in osteoblasts. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2008;6:72–76. CrossRef

83. 83Weber JM, Forsythe SR, Christianson CA, et al. Parathyroid hormone stimulates expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1 in osteoblastic cells. Bone. 2006;39:485–493. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (892 KB) | CrossRef

84. 84Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425:841–846. CrossRef

85. 85Zhang J, Niu C, Ye L, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425:836–841. CrossRef

86. 86Garrett RW, Emerson SG. The role of parathyroid hormone and insulin-like growth factors in hematopoietic niches: physiology and pharmacology. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;288:6–10. CrossRef

87. 87Pennisi A, Ling W, Perkins P, et al. PTH and bortezomib suppress growth of primary human myeloma through increased bone formation in vivo. [abstract] Blood. 2006;108:Abstract 509.

88. 88Zangari M, Pappas L, Zhan F, et al. Parathyroid hormones (PTH) serum variations are associated with bortezomib response in multiple myeloma patients. [abstract] Blood. 2008;112:Abstract 2783.

Cattedra di Ematologia e CTMO, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Parma, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationOffprint requests to: Nicola Giuliani, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Hematology and BMT Center, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy

PII: S0301-472X(09)00134-9

doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2009.04.004


View previous. 2 of 14 View next.