Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 784-790 (July 2009)


View previous. 3 of 14 View next.

Proteomics-based prediction of clinical response in acute myeloid leukemia

Maher AlbitaraCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Steven J. Pottsb, Francis J. Gilesc, Susan O'Briend, Iman Jilania, Amber C. Donahuea, Elihu H. Esteyd, Hagop Kantarjiand

Received 28 June 2008; received in revised form 27 January 2009; accepted 4 March 2009. published online 17 April 2009.

Objective

Response to chemotherapy is achieved in 60% to 70% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The ability to predict responders may help in stratifying patients and exploring different therapeutic approaches for nonresponders. Proteomics methods were used to search for predictive factors or combinations of factors.

Materials and Methods

Peripheral blood plasma samples from 41 patients with confirmed acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate or poor cytogenetics were obtained prior to induction therapy for proteomic analysis. For each plasma sample, four fractions eluted from a strong anion column were applied to 3 different ProteinChip array surfaces and 12 surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization spectra were generated. Peaks that correlated with response were identified, and decision trees incorporating these peaks along with various clinical and laboratory findings were constructed to predict response.

Results

Multiple decision trees were constructed. One peak, when combined with age, provided strong positive prediction of responders with 83% accuracy. A second tree, which combined one peak with both cytogenetics and the percent of monocytes in peripheral blood, detected responders with 95% accuracy. A third peak was adequate to predict responders in the intermediate cytogenetic group with 86% accuracy.

Conclusions

Proteomic analysis should be further explored to define factors important in predicting clinical response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

a Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, Calif., USA

b Aperio Technologies, Vista, Calif., USA

c Division of Hematology, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas, Health Science Center, San Antonio, Tex., USA

d Leukemia Department, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA

Corresponding Author InformationOffprint requests to: Maher Albitar, M.D., Quest Diagnostics, Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92690-6130

PII: S0301-472X(09)00129-5

doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2009.03.011


View previous. 3 of 14 View next.